(Event Ticker Requires JavaScript and Flash) Download the latest Flash player

Chamberlain and Malanga Settle Fake 'Warhol' Suit

John Chamberlain has a lot going on these days, with a big show opening next February at the Guggenheim and a show of monumental photo-based works debuting at Steven Kasher Gallery in September. So he must be relieved to have resolved a much-reported, contentious five-year-long lawsuit.

Art in America has learned that the lawsuit involving Chamberlain, former Warhol assistant Gerard Malanga and an allegedly fake Warhol was quietly settled on Apr. 12, "on the eve" of its going to trial, according to Malanga's attorney Peter Stern. The settlement, the terms of which remain confidential, came a few weeks before the May 5 opening of Chamberlain's first show at Gagosian Gallery in New York.





Asked to comment on the case, Stern told A.i.A. that "Mr. Malanga is very pleased that this matter has been resolved." He said that "there has been no retraction of allegations in the complaint and no one has acknowledged that they are in possession of or know the whereabouts of the painting."

The work in question, 315 Johns, comprising a grid of small portraits of Chamberlain, was authenticated by the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board in 2000. According to the board's own guidelines, it reserves the right to change its opinions upon the discovery of new information. Calls and e-mails to the authentication board regarding whether it will revisit this decision were not immediately answered.

Malanga, a photographer and one of Warhol's assistants, filed a suit against Chamberlain in 2005, accusing him of selling a 1967 painting that he knew was a fake and that did not rightfully belong to him. He was seeking $250,000 in damages and the return of the work, which he claimed to have created with two friends in 1971—after his time at the Factory—as an "homage" to Warhol. Malanga lost track of the painting. He said Warhol never knew of its existence. Malanga recounted in the complaint that at an art fair in 2004 he ran into Chamberlain, who boasted, "You know that painting you made of me? I sold it for $5 million."

Chamberlain claimed that he acquired the work as one of several art swaps with Warhol. His repeated requests to have the case dismissed were rejected by several courts. In an affidavit, Chamberlain asserted that the work "was conceived and created by Andy Warhol, in discussions with [me] and Henry Geldzahler." Geldzahler, the famous Metropolitan Museum curator, died in 1994.

According to legal documents, Chamberlain sold the piece in 2000 for more than $3 million to an unnamed collector after the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board determined that it was genuine. Testimony from Jim Jacobs, an artist, dealer, onetime assistant to Chamberlain and purported co-creator of 315 Johns, supported Malanga's version of events, as did that of Chamberlain's ex-wife, Lorraine, who stated in an affidavit that he often referred to the canvas as "fake" or "phony" Warhol.

Email Share
Comments

Add a Comment

Preview

chrishampton  08/24/11 5:01am

authenticity of the series, the curator of Warhol's 1965 retrospective, its inclusion in two of Warhol's own catalogue raisonne's ( as well as the 1975 work published in Germany) how can this series be allowed to be denied by this mysterious board, yet a clear fake such as '315 johns' be included? Its absurd.

Its quite telling that Warhol foundation president Joel Wachs spend over $7 million dollars of Warhol's funds burying the evidence under a mountain of paperwork, instead of allowing a symposium to review the facts about the series in the manner of a gentleman as Simon and the Tate modern requested. This is what happens when a foundation is run by lawyers and accountants, proper scholarly routes fall by the wayside.

I do hope the foundation has the decency of reviewing the '315' johns as well as the red self portraits. The silence of the art world due to the generous grants made to certain individuals in the art community is shameful.

chrishampton  08/24/11 5:01am

Congrats to Gerard Malanga. As a member of Warhol's inner circle, he clearly is in a position to know whether or not the work was by the artist. The whole affair just seemed absurd, how could Warhol have made such an enormous painting in 1967 in such a small space as the factory was at that time without anyone being aware of it? For over 34 years? Does the Andy Warhol Art Authentication Board ever admit their mistakes?

This now leaves the ten well documented red self portraits, one owned by Joe Simon, another other in trust for the British public, the rest owned by the families of those who lent and bartered with Warhol thousands of dollars worth of goods.

Gerard Malanga stated in Vanity Fair that "warhol was always experimenting, how can the board say that Joe's ( Simon's red self portrait) painting is not real?" This is re iterated in a well researched art news piece by Kelly Devine Thomas in 2004.

With virtually all of the factory regulars at the time confirming the aut

Sign up to receive the Art in America Newsletter

Thank you for signing up.
DECODING IMAGES

Collage and acrylic on paper, thread, string, plastic lid
48 x 30 ¼ in.










Also
Market News